维基百科:經濟學專題/評級
对于维基人来说,最有价值的莫过于他们的时间和精力了。为了最高效率地利用这些稀有资源, 经济学专题使用了条目评级制度。对条目的质量进行评估能让我们看到哪些条目最需要编辑。 而通过评估条目的重要性, 我们就能知道哪些主题对经济学来说是至关重要的。这些信息对经济学专题来说是生死攸关的。 请理性地进行决策。
經濟學專題模板编辑
將尚未包含於專題的經濟學文章加上{{WikiProject Economics}}
即可把文章加入專題,即便沒有評級也會被列入未評級分類。
評級步驟及語法编辑
- Go to Unassessed Economics articles and Unknown-importance Economics articles. These categories contain the articles that need to be assessed.
- Click on an article link - this should take you to the talk page.
- Click on the "Article" tab - look at the article and make an assessment. (See also: Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment if you need help)
- Click on the "Discussion" tab - this should return you to the talk page.
- Click the "Edit this Page" tab. You will see
{{WikiProject Economics|class=|importance=}}
at the top of the page. - Fill in the tag's attributes.
- Fill in
|class=
using one of these values: Stub, Start, List, C, B, GA, A, FA; examples and criteria for these classes are listed below. - Fill in
|importance=
using one of these values: Top, High, Mid, Low, NA; examples of these ratings for WikiProject Economics are below.
- Fill in
- You're done! (unless you want to go back and do another assessment) -- we hope you will!
等級编辑
级别 | 标准 | 读者感受 | 编辑建议 | 实例 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
典範 | 条目通过正式评审,现为典範條目。
|
专业、杰出、深入;是可靠的百科信息来源。 | 除非条目所述事物有了发展,否则不需大量增加内容;可能需要改进文法,让条目行文更加优美。 | Tulip mania (as of September 2008, March 2014) |
||
甲 | 条目组织完善、基本完整,经相应专题或其他方式同行评审。甲级条目无需优良条目资格。
|
对所有读者都非常实用。对主题进行了完整解释,非主题专家通常对内容感到满足。 | 条目或需在专业知识和格式方面进行调整,或可提交同行评审改进。 | Economy of England in the Middle Ages (as of May 2012) |
||
优良 | 条目通过正式评审,现为优良条目。
|
无明显问题,对几乎所有读者都实用。基本达到(未必完全符合)专业百科全书水准。 | 可能需要了解相关领域者,以及格式方面的专家进行修改,同相关领域的典范条目比较,可能会看到条目内容的缺失与短板。 | Milton Friedman (as of August 2008) |
||
乙 | 条目已基本完成,没有大问题,但在达到优良条目标准前仍需更多工作。
|
读者一般不需要更多信息,但严谨的学生和研究人员未必满意。 | 条目的某些部分和格式需要修改,并可能需要专业知识。如果现实的话,应当考虑增加图表。此外,应检查条目是否基本遵循格式手册和相关格式指引。 | Adam Smith (as of April 2008) |
||
丙 | 条目内容相对充实,但或有重要内容缺失,或包含大量无关内容。条目应有一些可靠参考来源,但仍有明显问题需要大幅清理。
|
对随便看看的读者比较实用,但即使是不过分追求细节的读者,也会感到不全面。 | 应填补内容缺失,并进行清理。 | Cardinal utility (as of February 2011) |
||
初 | 发展中,但非常不完整的条目。条目可靠来源可能引用充分,也可能不充分。
|
有一些有意义内容,但对于多数读者仍属不足。 | 应当尽快提供可靠来源,并需大幅更动和组织内容。此外也可改善语法、别字、写作风格、术语的使用。 | Macroeconomics (as of August 2008) |
||
小作品 | 对主题非常基本的描述。不过,任何质量极差的条目都属于该等级。
|
有意义内容很少,比词典解释稍长一点。 | 任何编辑或者增加内容都会有帮助。应当尽快增加有意义的内容。 | Redemption value (as of August 2008) |
||
特色列表 | 条目现为特色列表。
|
专业水准。它完整覆盖所属范围,通常能提供一个完整的列表,并为每一项提供有用的信息。 | 除非有所属范围新发展,不应增加内容。 | List of recessions in the United States (as of June 20012) |
||
列表 | 符合独立列表的要求,是一个主要内容为列表的条目,通常包含指向特定领域条目的内部链接。 | 列表没有特定的格式,但是内容的组织应当有逻辑性,对读者有用。 | 列表应当包含蓝色链接,并且命名恰当,组织合理。 | 聯合國會員國列表 |
重要度编辑
Below is a list of the importance criteria developed by the WikiProject Economics community. It is very much a work in progress, and as such is open to debate, interpretation, and modification. Please be bold when assessing! If you come across an article that you think is assessed incorrectly, change it to what you think it should be. If the criteria indicate one level but you think it's another, reassess it and discuss on the assessment talk page to let the community weigh in. As we decide more edge cases, the criteria will become focused and reflect consensus (they are meant to be positive, not normative).
Note that priority is a relative term. If priority or importance values are applied within WikiProject Economics, these only reflect the perceived priority to this project. An article judged to be "Top-Class" for WP:ECON may be only "Mid-Class" in another project.
重要度 | 标准 | 实例 |
---|---|---|
极高 | Subject is crucial to the field of economics, and a must-have for Wikipedia. Lay people would be able to easily identify the subject as a part of economics. Introductory courses in economics are likely to discuss the subject. | Microeconomics, Inflation, Capitalism, |
高 | Subject is important but not vital to a lay person's overview of economics. Broad economic topics taught at the undergraduate college level are likely of high importance. This includes biographies of highly distinguished economists who may not be well-known outside the field of economics. | Imperfect competition, Gross domestic product, Adam Smith, Robert Solow |
中 | Subject fills in more minor details of economics, or adds a depth of understanding to the field. A practicing economist would find these subjects useful, but lay people would likely not. | Gini coefficient, Keynesian cross |
低 | Subject is only marginally important to the field of economics. Either the subject is of limited interest even to specialists, or it is tenuously connected to economics as a discipline. | Redemption value, Freiburg School, Lifeboat economics |