印度教性
印度教性（Hindutva），或译印度教特性（Hinduness），是一种印度教民族主義的表現形式[1]。這術語由維納亞克·達莫德爾·薩瓦卡於1923年創造[2]，這種意識形態被國民志願服務團及印度人民黨使用[3][4]。
印度教性運動被描述為“右翼極端主義”[5]的變體和“幾乎是古典意義上的法西斯主義”，堅持同質化多數和文化霸權的概念。[6][6]一些分析家對印度教與法西斯主義的認定存在爭議，並認為印度教是一種極端形式的保守主義或“民族專制主義”[7]。
参考资料 编辑
- ^ Purandare, Vaibhav. Hindutva is not the same as Hinduism said Savarkar. telegraphindia.com. 22 August 2019 [23 December 2020]. （原始内容存档于2020-04-20）.
- ^ Pavan Kulkarni. How Did Savarkar, a Staunch Supporter of British Colonialism, Come to Be Known as 'Veer'?. The Wire. 28 May 2019 [2023-01-13]. （原始内容存档于2019-05-28）.
- ^ The Hindutva Road （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Frontline, 4 December 2004
- ^ Krishna 2011，第324頁.
- ^ Leidig, Eviane. Hindutva as a variant of right-wing extremism. Patterns of Prejudice. 17 July 2020, 54 (3): 215–237. ISSN 0031-322X. doi:10.1080/0031322X.2020.1759861
.
- ^ 6.0 6.1 Frykenberg 2008，第178–220頁: "This essay attempts to show how — from an analytical or from an historical perspective — Hindutva is a melding of Hindu fascism and Hindu fundamentalism."
- ^ Chetan Bhatt; Parita Mukta. Hindutva in the West: Mapping the Antinomies of Diaspora Nationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies. May 2000, 23 (3): 407–441. S2CID 143287533. doi:10.1080/014198700328935. Quote: "It is also argued that the distinctively Indian aspects of Hindu nationalism, and the RSS's disavowal of the seizure of state power in preference for long-term cultural labour in civil society, suggests a strong distance from both German Nazism and Italian Fascism. Part of the problem in attempting to classify Golwalkar's or Savarkar's Hindu nationalism within the typology of 'generic fascism', Nazism, racism and ethnic or cultural nationalism is the unavailability of an appropriate theoretical orientation and vocabulary for varieties of revolutionary conservatism and far-right-wing ethnic and religious absolutist movements in 'Third World' countries".
