File:Maurya Empire, c.250 BCE.png

原始文件(1,200 × 1,121像素,文件大小:2.3 MB,MIME类型:image/png


摘要

描述

This is based on the map provided on p. 69 of Kulke, H.; Rothermund, D. (2004), A History of India, 4th, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-32920-0.

  • According to the authors, the empty areas within the boundaries of the empire were the "autonomous and free tribes".
  • For individual edicts, see also: Schwartzberg, J. E. (1992), A Historical Atlas of South Asia: University of Oxford Press; and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Edicts_of_Ashoka
  • According to both Kulke & Rothermund (p. 68-71), as well as Stein (p. 74), large areas, especially in the Deccan peninsula, were probably occupied by fairly autonomous or even unconquered tribes.

    "Of course, it is not impossible that some may be still discovered but after more than a century of intensive research in this field it seems highly unlikely that the regional pattern mentioned above would have to be completely revised. This means that large parts of present Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh as well as Kerala and Tamil Nadu were not actually included in the Maurya empire. South of the Vindhya mountains the Mauryas mainly controlled the coastal areas and some of the interior near present Mysore which they probably coveted because of the gold which was found there (Suvarnagiri means ‘gold mountain’). For the empire it was essential to control the major trade routes. Most important was certainly the northern route which led from Pataliputra through the Gangetic plain and the Panjab to Afghanistan. Another led from Pataliputra west via Kausambi and then along the northern slope of the Vindhya mountains via Vidisha (Sanchi) and Ujjain to the port of Bharukacha (Broach). There was a further route from there along the west coast to the area of present Bombay where the great rock edicts of Sopara were found. Southern parts could be reached along the east coast or via a central route from Ujjain via Pratishthana (Paithan near Aurangabad) to Suvarnagiri."

  • "The major part of the Deccan was ruled by [Mauryan administration]. But in the belt of land on either side of the Nerbudda, the Godavari and the upper Mahanadi there were, in all probability, certain areas that were technically outside the limits of the empire proper. Asoka evidently draws a distinction between the forests and the inhabiting tribes which are in the dominions (vijita) and peoples on the border (anta avijita) for whose benefit some of the special edicts were issued. Certain vassal tribes are specifically mentioned." (Raychaudhuri & Mukherjee pp. 275-6)
  • "Desert of Gedrosia [...] was left an unclaimed wilderness." —Kosmin, Paul J. (2014), The Land of the Elephant Kings Space, Territory, and Ideology in the Seleucid Empire, Harvard University Press, p.16
  • See also --Stein, Burton (1998). A History of India (1st ed.), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. --Raychaudhuri, H. C.; Mukherjee, B. N. (1996). Political History of Ancient India: From the Accession of Parikshit to the Extinction of the Gupta Dynasty. Oxford University Press.
  • Background from http://www2.demis.nl/mapserver/mapper.asp
  • Made with GIMP
日期
来源 自己的作品
作者 Avantiputra7

许可协议

我,本作品著作权人,特此采用以下许可协议发表本作品:
w:zh:知识共享
署名 相同方式共享
您可以自由地:
  • 共享 – 复制、发行并传播本作品
  • 修改 – 改编作品
惟须遵守下列条件:
  • 署名 – 您必须对作品进行署名,提供授权条款的链接,并说明是否对原始内容进行了更改。您可以用任何合理的方式来署名,但不得以任何方式表明许可人认可您或您的使用。
  • 相同方式共享 – 如果您再混合、转换或者基于本作品进行创作,您必须以与原先许可协议相同或相兼容的许可协议分发您贡献的作品。

说明

添加一行文字以描述该文件所表现的内容
India under Maurya rule c. 250 BCE

文件历史

点击某个日期/时间查看对应时刻的文件。

最新 | 最旧) 查看(较新10条 | )(10 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500
日期/时间缩⁠略⁠图大小用户备注
当前2024年1月29日 (一) 02:152024年1月29日 (一) 02:15版本的缩略图1,200 × 1,121(2.3 MB)Avantiputra7as per discussions added labelling of provinces
2023年11月22日 (三) 06:402023年11月22日 (三) 06:40版本的缩略图1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 05:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC) no justification for changing to less legible version of exactly the same map
2023年11月22日 (三) 06:142023年11月22日 (三) 06:14版本的缩略图1,500 × 1,309(2.93 MB)Indo12122Reverted to version as of 05:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC) Stop hijacking.
2023年11月22日 (三) 05:592023年11月22日 (三) 05:59版本的缩略图1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 05:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
2023年11月22日 (三) 05:342023年11月22日 (三) 05:34版本的缩略图1,500 × 1,309(2.93 MB)Indo12122Reverted to version as of 19:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
2023年11月22日 (三) 05:062023年11月22日 (三) 05:06版本的缩略图1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 18:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC) rv vandalism
2023年11月21日 (二) 19:002023年11月21日 (二) 19:00版本的缩略图1,500 × 1,309(2.93 MB)Indo12122Reverted to version as of 17:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC) Adding Gedrosia .Ray, Himanshu Prabha (2003). The Archaeology of Seafaring in Ancient South Asia. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01109-9. In spite of the vagueness of the historical texts, the consensus among scholars is that the treaty concluded between Candragupta Maurya and Seleucus acknowledged Indian control of territories to the west of the Indus. These included Gedrosia, Paropamisadae (the region of Kabul and Begram) a...
2023年11月21日 (二) 18:132023年11月21日 (二) 18:13版本的缩略图1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 17:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC) no justification for changing to less legible version of exactly the same map
2023年11月21日 (二) 17:532023年11月21日 (二) 17:53版本的缩略图1,500 × 1,309(2.93 MB)Indo12122Reverted to version as of 16:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
2023年11月21日 (二) 17:072023年11月21日 (二) 17:07版本的缩略图1,200 × 1,121(2.06 MB)Avantiputra7Reverted to version as of 16:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
最新 | 最旧) 查看(较新10条 | )(10 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500

以下页面使用本文件:

全域文件用途

元数据