摘要

此graph图片可使用矢量图形重新创建为SVG文件。这具有很多好处；更多信息请参见共享资源:待清理媒体。如果存在此图片的SVG格式，请将其上传，然后将此模板替换为{{vector version available|新图片名称}}。 建议您将SVG命名为“Sectoral Financial Balances in U.S. Economy.svg”，这样在使用Vector version available（或Vva）模板时就不需要填写新图片名称参数。

Other information:

Original upload date (on English Wikipedia): 2013-03-24

Based on article from Martin Wolf, cited below.

Understanding the chart

This chart is based on an article and graphic from economist Martin Wolf. Wolf explained in July 2012 that government fiscal balance is one of three major financial sectoral balances in the U.S. economy, the others being the foreign financial sector and the private financial sector. The sum of the surpluses or deficits across these three sectors must be zero by definition. The three data series are:

1. Foreign sector financial balance: This is the capital account. A foreign financial surplus or capital account surplus exists because capital is imported (net) to fund the U.S. trade deficit. To finance imports greater than exports, capital must be imported by definition; this is called a surplus.
2. Private sector financial balance: This is the difference between private savings (mostly by consumers) and private investment (mostly by businesses). One way to think about an economy is that consumers save and businesses take the savings and invest it. The two figures tend to move in tandem. However, if consumers are saving but businesses are not investing, a surplus develops. In the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis, savings increased but investment declined dramatically, moving this balance from deficit into surplus.
3. Government sector financial balance: This is the difference between government revenues less spending. It would be the sum of federal, state and local budget surpluses or deficits.

By definition, with the first two in surplus there must therefore exist a government budget deficit so all three net to zero. For example, the government budget deficit in 2011 was approximately 10% GDP (8.6% GDP of which was federal), offsetting a capital surplus of 4% GDP and a private sector surplus of 6% GDP.^[1][2] Wolf argued that the sudden shift in the private sector from deficit to surplus forced the government balance into deficit, writing: "The financial balance of the private sector shifted towards surplus by the almost unbelievable cumulative total of 11.2 per cent of gross domestic product between the third quarter of 2007 and the second quarter of 2009, which was when the financial deficit of US government (federal and state) reached its peak...No fiscal policy changes explain the collapse into massive fiscal deficit between 2007 and 2009, because there was none of any importance. The collapse is explained by the massive shift of the private sector from financial deficit into surplus or, in other words, from boom to bust."^[3] Wolf also explained that if the government budget deficit had been forced to zero with the same capital surplus, the private sector income (and thus savings) would have fallen dramatically (likely a Depression) to bring that sector back into deficit, such that all three sectors would net to zero: "There is absolutely no doubt what would have happened if the government had been unwilling to borrow when borrowing by the private sector collapsed: we would have seen a huge depression. Fortunately, that did not happen. Government borrowed. Of course, that did not fully offset the collapse in private borrowing. But it helped."^[4] An up-to-date version of the chart (directionally correct but not exactly) can be viewed here: FRED Database-Chart of Financial Sector Balances

As a formula

The above expressed as an equation or mathematical identity: C+G+T = 0.

• C: Private sector financial balance (+ for private sector surplus, where savings is greater than investment, - for private sector deficit, where savings is less than investment)
• G: Government sector financial balance (+ for budget surplus, - for budget deficit)
• T: Foreign sector financial balance (+ for capital surplus or trade deficit, - for capital deficit or trade surplus)

Note that if you define the foreign sector balance instead as the current account balance (i.e., trade deficit is a - and trade surplus is a +), the formula becomes C+G-T=0.^[5]

The graphic can also be describing using the Keynesian equilibrium formula, where injections equals withdrawals:

• Investment + Government + Exports = Savings + Taxes + Imports
• I + G + X = S + T + M

Rearranging using algebra to show the data series in the graphic:

• (G-T) + (X-M) = (S-I)
• 0 = (S-I) + (T-G) - (X-M)
• S-I is the private sector balance, a positive amount as savings has exceeded investment since 2009.
• T-G is the government sector balance, a negative number as the government has run deficits from 2002-2015.
• X-M is the foreign sector, a negative number (trade deficit or capital surplus). Since the formula is subtracting this amount, we graph the inverse (*-1) so it appears as a positive number in the graph.

Note that this equation holds at economic equilibrium only, but is useful for illustrating the concepts.

Creating the chart

Via BEA (Exact)

The source data is the BEA Integrated Macroeconomic accounts^[6], table S.2.a.^[7]

• Private: Households (Row 39, 40) + Business (41, 42)
• Government: Federal (Row 43) + State and local (44)
• Foreign (Rest of the World): Row 45 (statistical discrepancy NIPA) and Row 46.

I used nominal GDP data from FRED for each year to make the GDP conversion, using the Q4 annualized number.

Table S.2.a "Selected Aggregates for Total Economy and Sectors" along with FA codes appears in this report, in Appendix B.^[8][9]

The New Policy Institute published a 2011 paper that explains how the balances can be computed with a separation of private into households and business, along with a helpful graph and the FA codes used in the computation.^[10]

Via FRED

• Three line annual: This FRED graph includes the foreign sector (blue), private (green) and government (red) via FRED. The statistical discrepancy is included with the rest of the world/foreign sector.^[11]
• Three line quarterly.^[12]
• Four line annual splits the private sector into household and business components.^[13]
• Four line quarterly.^[14]

Note that when these charts are downloaded, a horizontal sum of each time period should roughly net to zero.

Understanding the private sector financial balance

Economist Paul Krugman also explained in December 2011 the causes of the sizable shift from private sector deficit to surplus in the U.S.: "This huge move into surplus reflects the end of the housing bubble, a sharp rise in household saving, and a slump in business investment due to lack of customers."^[15] The private sector financial balance is the net of the savings and investment lines shown in the "Private Sector Financial Surplus" chart at right. In other words, if you graphed the expression "Private savings - Business investment" as one line and as a % GDP, you would get in the blue line in the "Sectoral Financial Balances in the U.S. Economy" chart.

References

许可协议

User:Farcaster，本作品著作权人，特此采用以下许可协议发表本作品：

已授权您依据自由软件基金会发行的无固定段落及封面封底文字（Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts, and Back-Cover Texts）的GNU自由文件许可协议1.2版或任意后续版本的条款，复制、传播和／或修改本文件。该协议的副本请见“GNU Free Documentation License”。http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.htmlGFDLGNU Free Documentation Licensetruetrue

本文件采用知识共享署名-相同方式共享 3.0 未本地化版本许可协议授权。

署名: User:Farcaster

您可以自由地：

• 共享 – 复制、发行并传播本作品
• 修改 – 改编作品

惟须遵守下列条件：

• 署名 – 您必须对作品进行署名，提供授权条款的链接，并说明是否对原始内容进行了更改。您可以用任何合理的方式来署名，但不得以任何方式表明许可人认可您或您的使用。
• 相同方式共享 – 如果您再混合、转换或者基于本作品进行创作，您必须以与原先许可协议相同或相兼容的许可协议分发您贡献的作品。

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0CC BY-SA 3.0 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 truetrue

您可以选择您需要的许可协议。

原始上传日志

本檔案是由NUMB3RN7NE使用CommonsHelper，從en.wikipedia轉移到維基共享資源。