讨论:人格性

2A02:587:4103:1800:C527:40EF:5DFE:1493在话题“Personhood is not metalogically fundamental”中的最新留言:5年前

Personhood is not metalogically fundamental

编辑

According to "information theory" personhood requires components like "memory/memories". I use "..." because you have to add the correct Chinese active link.

Personhood is a process of informational interactions.

It requires a medium, biological or electronic (iff -yes iff with ff- an electronic limbic system is created).


Personhood is neither precosmic, nor self-causal, nor cosmogonous. It's not proven fundamental because it requires knowledge of previous information and persons.

Pretopological algebra might be self-causal in some theories.

Read: pretopological space.


Please enrich the Chinese article.


Ok. We might debate if the Chinese are evil against the Uyghurs; it is open to debate. According to Western standards the Chinese state is racist by definition.

On the other hand the Uyghurs claim that some personhood is more fundamental than the universe; just for cultural reasons and without any metalogical, theoretical or material proof.

You might have the right to believe in whatever; but our children are humans and not objects. They should learn about physics, metalogic and the supposedly precosmic person and select.—以上未签名的留言由2A02:587:4103:1800:C527:40EF:5DFE:1493对话)于2019年8月19日 (一) 16:17 (UTC)加入。回复

返回到“人格性”页面。